Open to AI Implementation & Automation roles — remote worldwide

I find the manual work that costs the most, and automate it into a process the team adopts.

Eight years in B2B and marketplace operations — ~150 deals a month, ~200 SKUs, ~2,000 active accounts — with AI implementation across three functions in 2025–2026. About three hours a day returned per sales manager, reporting from over a week to two days, and product content brought in-house.

AI Implementation & Automation Manager · process discovery · CRM/ERP integration · AI agents · adoption & enablement

ask-my-cv — grounded in Ivan's approved record local · no API calls

Ask about my work. Get an answer from the record.

A transparent knowledge-base demo: fixed answers from my case records, with a source label. Ask about delivery, outcomes or technical work — or download my CV.

Runs in your browser. No external AI requests, email collection or invented answers. If a topic is not in the record, the widget says so.

01Before · Implemented · After

Three implementations inside a live business. All three still in daily use.

Each one started the same way: find the manual workflow that costs the most, quantify it, then decide whether to automate it or redesign it. A company running ~150 deals a month gets no maintenance window — every change had to work while the business kept selling.

A1

Multi-channel lead intake — automated capture into CRM

2025–2026
Before

Inbound leads landed across several disconnected channels and were transcribed into amoCRM by hand. Leads were missed, data-entry errors reached the pipeline, and three reps lost a third of every morning to triage instead of selling.

→
Implemented
  • Mapped the intake workflow end to end and quantified the cost of each manual step
  • Built source parsing and automatic deal creation in amoCRM, with validation and exception handling on the fields sales needs at quoting time
  • Redesigned task rules and Salesbot automations around the process as it actually runs
→
After
≈3 h/day

returned to each sales manager, by my operational estimate. The team redirected that time into client work, with fewer missed leads and manual-entry errors.

Adoption: full sales team migrated and still runs on it. I wrote the SOP and trained the team.
amoCRMsource parsing workflow automationSalesbot
A2

Commercial reporting — AI agents over live business data

2025–2026
Before

Sales, supply, inventory turnover and revenue analysis ran off manual marketplace exports and consumed a week or more of the owner's time every cycle. Decisions waited on the report.

→
Implemented
  • Deployed AI agents (Claude Code, Codex, Hermes) against company databases and marketplace report exports
  • Defined the decision questions the business actually asks, so the output drives action instead of producing another dashboard
  • Built the runbook and trained the company owner to operate it himself
→
After
−70%

faster reporting cycle — from over a week to two days. Commercial decisions now move at the speed of the business.

Adoption: the owner runs it unaided. Delivering a tool only its author can operate is not an implementation — it is a dependency.
AI agentsClaude CodeCodex Hermesstakeholder training
A3

Marketplace content — vendor replaced by an in-house AI pipeline

2026
Before

Every product card came from an external design vendor: brief, wait, invoice, repeat. Card performance was never measured, so spend continued with no evidence of what actually sold.

→
Implemented
  • Ran A/B tests across the existing catalogue to identify which designs converted
  • Built a training set from the top-converting cards — selection driven by commercial data, not preference
  • Trained and deployed a Style LoRA reproducing that proven style locally, and handed the tool to the marketplace manager
→
After
Vendor

dependency removed. The marketplace manager now produces and ships cards directly, at the style the data proved converts.

Commercial logic: the training images were selected from A/B-tested product cards. The goal was a repeatable content workflow the marketplace manager could own.
A/B testingdataset curation Style LoRAComfyUIIdeogram 4

Client delivery and team-built products.

A clinical practice, a service centre and a community-events product. Different domains, same approach: understand the routine, build the useful part, and hand it over.

C1

A clinician's method, running as a live screening tool

2026
Before

Parents arrived at a first appointment with a vague description — "he won't listen, school is going badly". The specialist spent the session extracting a structured picture instead of working with it, and appointment time is a practice's most expensive resource.

→
Implemented
  • Encoded the specialist's existing framework — Luria's three functional blocks — rather than inventing my own scoring: 17 questions on the energy block, 10 on information processing, 15 on programming and control
  • Designed around the real user, a tired parent on a phone: nine school-related questions are hidden for pre-school children, and a back button removes the previous answer instead of just scrolling
  • Different thresholds per age band, and a tie-break order between blocks so an ambiguous result resolves by clinical weight rather than by whichever block came first
→
After
42

questions, scored per block. Approximately 60+ families have used it, according to the client; the specialist receives a profile before consultation.

Live and taking clients. Two outcomes the specialist reports: less appointment time spent gathering history, and parents who now reach the consultation on their own. The tool structures a parent's observations for a qualified professional — it does not diagnose, and is not presented as doing so.
domain modellingNode.js Telegrafsurvey UX
C2

Customer needs captured before a manager picks up

2025–2026
Before

Every enquiry for a custom PC build started with the same round of questions — budget, use cases, component preferences, deadlines. Managers repeated it by hand with every customer before they could propose anything.

→
Implemented
  • Mapped the qualification conversation managers were already having, then moved it ahead of first contact
  • The bot collects budget, usage patterns, component preferences and timing, and delivers a customer profile into the team's working chat — the main need identified, not raw answers
  • Deliberately stopped short of recommending builds: the routine moves to the system, the expertise stays with the specialist
→
After
170+

customers qualified in six months, approximately, according to the client. Managers receive a structured brief before first contact.

Delivered and closed. This is the shape most automation requests actually take: not replacing the expert, but removing the identical opening conversation they have three hundred times a year.
lead qualificationrequirements discovery Telegramhandover to sales
C3

Community events — from a poll to a measurable attendance funnel

2026
Before

Across 11 community meetups, people pressed "Yes" 45 times — and nobody ever counted how many arrived. 148 answered "Maybe", more than the yes votes, and that segment was never worked at all. The organiser could not tell how many to cater for, or whether anything was improving.

→
Implemented
  • Product Owner in a team of three on weekly sprints with daily stand-ups — Jira, Slack, GitHub, Google Workspace
  • Designed the funnel Maybe → confirmed → attended → rated → returned, measuring confirmation and attendance as separate events
  • "I'm here" appears one hour before the meetup and not earlier, so it measures attendance rather than intention; only attendees can rate, so scores are not diluted by people who saw an announcement
→
After
1 day

from zero to a working MVP on a permanent public address — with a way to measure turnout that the organizer did not have before.

Partnership with a stake in the product. The hard part was not the build — it was refusing to measure intention when everyone else does. Attendance is the number the organiser actually needs.
Product OwnerJira · Slack weekly sprintsFastAPI · React
B1

The operating system underneath — eight years of commercial systems

2018–2026
Before

Joined as the company's only sales manager. Sales, procurement, warehouse and logistics coordinated by memory and messages, so reps quoted dates the warehouse could not meet.

→
Implemented
  • Rebuilt the lead-to-order workflow in amoCRM — pipelines, stages, task rules, telephony and messenger integrations
  • Integrated amoCRM with MoySklad ERP over REST APIs: live per-SKU stock at quoting time, a picking queue that stopped losing assembly requests, one shipment view for logistics
  • Launched three national marketplace channels from zero — Ozon, Wildberries, Yandex Market — growing to ~35% of company revenue
  • Scaled the team from 1 to 8 and built the enablement layer: sales scripts by client type, onboarding, SOPs, pricing rules and the KPI scheme. New reps productive in 2–3 weeks
→
After
5.4×

company revenue growth over eight years — RUB 21M to RUB 114M — a company and team result across B2B, marketplace and distributor channels.

Why this is the foundation: knowing where a commercial operation actually breaks is what makes an AI implementation land. I spent eight years inside the process before automating it.
amoCRM × MoySklad ERPAPI integration Ozon · WB · Yandex Marketprocurementteam 1→8
02Verifiable evidence

Selected products and the commercial context behind the work.

Open the linked products below. Storefront figures are historical snapshots of channel scale, not my individual sales or a current live counter.

Ozon · ECOLINE storefront2026 snapshot
4.9rating
27.8Kreviews
77.2Korders

The channel I launched from zero — listings, pricing, fulfilment logic — grown to ~35% of company revenue before handover to a dedicated team. Figures show channel scale.

Wildberries · ECOLINE storefront2026 snapshot
4.8rating
16,147units sold
89%kept, not returned

Historical storefront snapshot: 4.8 rating, 16,147 units sold and 89% keep rate. This describes the channel, not a measured effect of the later AI content pipeline.

$7,000 of paid media managed across four LATAM markets, with unit economics tracked end to end
5% → 80% blended ROI, month over month — 2 of 8 campaign structures reached profit, the rest were killed early
407 automated tests at the documented Velo release checkpoint; not a live counter
80 / 535 silent tool-call failures in a 535-reply sample; cause isolated with controlled tests
03How I deliver

The technology is the easy half. Adoption is where implementations fail.

Most AI projects stall not because the model underperforms, but because nobody redesigned the process around it or trained the people who own it. I deliver through to the point where the team runs it without me — and I build my own products to keep a working feel for what these tools do outside a demo.

Find the costliest manual workflow and quantify itWatch the process run, measure what each manual step actually costs in hours and errors, and rank by impact.
Decide: automate, or redesign firstAutomating a broken process just makes it fail faster. Some workflows need rethinking before any tool touches them.
Ship the smallest version that returns real timeScoped, shippable increments with explicit acceptance criteria — value this month beats a platform next quarter.
Build guardrails, validation and exception handlingTest outputs and edge cases by hand, document limits, and keep prototype behaviour distinct from production reliability.
Transfer ownership — SOPs, training, hands-on supportTrain the person who owns the process until it runs unaided. If it breaks when I leave, it was never implemented.
04Scope of expertise

Where I add value, and where I bring in specialists.

Clear scope is what makes a delivery estimate trustworthy. This is the line I work to.

I own this

  • AI implementation end to end: process discovery, solution design, rollout, stabilisation and measured business outcomes
  • Workflow automation and systems integration — CRM/ERP, REST APIs, webhooks, no-code platforms, AI agents over business data
  • Adoption and enablement: SOPs, stakeholder training, change management through to unaided operation
  • Team delivery: Product Owner on weekly sprints with daily stand-ups — Jira, Slack, GitHub, Google Workspace — plus commercial operations, pricing and margin modelling

I bring in specialists

  • Model research and training infrastructure — I apply and fine-tune production models rather than build architectures
  • Platform engineering and MLOps at enterprise scale — I define requirements and own delivery alongside engineering
  • Data warehousing and BI platform builds — I specify the decisions and metrics the business needs from them
  • Regulated-industry compliance review — I structure implementations so compliance can assess them cleanly
05Contact

If manual work is quietly costing your operation a week a month, that is the problem I solve.

Open to AI Implementation, AI Operations and Business Process Automation roles, remote worldwide. Based in Pattaya, Thailand; open to relocation, including Bangkok. English B2, native Russian; basic Chinese and beginner Thai.

Pattaya, Thailand · open to relocation Built by Ivan · AI-assisted, human-verified